Evaluate The Iterated Integral By Converting To Polar Coordinates. ./2 - Y2 5(x + Y) Dx Dy 12- 2v2 3

Evaluate The Iterated Integral By Converting To Polar Coordinates. ./2 - Y2 5(x + Y) Dx Dy 12- 2v2 3

When it comes to evaluating complex double integrals, especially those involving non-trivial regions or integrand functions, converting to polar coordinates often simplifies the process significantly. This approach is particularly useful when the region of integration is circular, elliptical, or can be more easily described in terms of radius and angle rather than Cartesian coordinates. Today, we will explore how to evaluate the iterated integral given by:

\[
\iint_{R} ( \text{expression} ) \, dx\,dy
\]

where the integral's bounds and the integrand suggest a transformation to polar coordinates, making the evaluation more straightforward. The specific integral in question appears to involve terms such as \(Y^2\), \(x + Y\), and constants like 12 and \(2\sqrt{3}\). Although the original notation appears somewhat fragmented, we will interpret and reconstruct the integral carefully to guide you through the process.

---

Understanding the Integral and Its Region of Integration

Before converting to polar coordinates, it’s crucial to interpret the integral's bounds and integrand correctly.

1. Deciphering the Integral Expression

The notation appears to be:

\[
\iint_{D} \left( 2 - y^2 + 5(x + y) \right) \, dx\,dy
\]

or similar, with bounds related to 12 and \(2\sqrt{3}\). Since the given expression is somewhat ambiguous, we'll assume the integral involves the function:

\[
f(x, y) = 2 - y^2 + 5(x + y)
\]

over a region \(D\). The bounds possibly relate to the region's limits, which might be a circle or a sector involving radii or angles corresponding to these constants.

2. Determining the Region \(D\)

Given the constants, a common region associated with such integrals involves circles or sectors:


  • The constant 12 could relate to a radius squared, i.e., \(r^2 = 12\), implying \(r = \sqrt{12} = 2\sqrt{3}\).

  • The mention of \(2\sqrt{3}\) supports this, suggesting the region might be a circle with radius \(2\sqrt{3}\).


Assuming the region \(D\) is a circle centered at the origin with radius \(2\sqrt{3}\):

\[
D: \quad x^2 + y^2 \leq 12
\]

which is a common scenario for converting to polar coordinates.

---

Converting Cartesian Coordinates to Polar Coordinates

Conversion to polar coordinates is a standard technique when dealing with circular regions, as it simplifies the bounds and often the integrand.

1. Polar Coordinate Definitions

The transformation from Cartesian \((x, y)\) to polar \((r, \theta)\) is given by:

\[
x = r \cos \theta
\]
\[
y = r \sin \theta
\]

where:


  • \(r \geq 0\) is the distance from the origin.

  • \(\theta \in [0, 2\pi)\) is the angle measured from the positive \(x\)-axis.


2. Jacobian for the Transformation

The differential area element transforms as:

\[
dx\,dy = r\,dr\,d\theta
\]

This Jacobian determinant accounts for the change of variables from Cartesian to polar coordinates.

3. Expressing the Integrand in Polar Coordinates

Given the integrand:

\[
f(x, y) = 2 - y^2 + 5(x + y)
\]

substituting \(x = r \cos \theta\) and \(y = r \sin \theta\):

\[
f(r, \theta) = 2 - (r \sin \theta)^2 + 5(r \cos \theta + r \sin \theta)
\]

which simplifies to:

\[
f(r, \theta) = 2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta + 5 r (\cos \theta + \sin \theta)
\]

---

Setting Up the Integral in Polar Coordinates

Having established the transformation, the integral becomes:

\[
\iint{D} f(x, y) \, dx\,dy = \int{\theta=0}^{2\pi} \int_{r=0}^{R} f(r, \theta) \, r \, dr\, d\theta
\]

where \(R = 2\sqrt{3}\).

1. Final Form of the Integral

\[
\boxed{
\int{0}^{2\pi} \int{0}^{2 \sqrt{3}} \left[ 2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta + 5 r (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \right] r \, dr\, d\theta
}
\]

This integral can now be tackled by integrating with respect to \(r\) first, then \(\theta\).

---

Evaluating the Integral Step-by-Step

Let's proceed systematically to evaluate the integral.

1. Expand the Integrand

The integrand:

\[
f(r, \theta) \times r = \left[ 2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta + 5 r (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \right] r
\]

becomes:

\[
I(r, \theta) = 2r - r^3 \sin^2 \theta + 5 r^2 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta)
\]

2. Integrate with Respect to \(r\)

The limits are from \(0\) to \(2\sqrt{3}\):

\[
\int_{0}^{2\sqrt{3}} \left( 2r - r^3 \sin^2 \theta + 5 r^2 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \right) dr
\]

Break this into three separate integrals:

\[
I1(\theta) = \int{0}^{2\sqrt{3}} 2r\, dr
\]
\[
I2(\theta) = - \sin^2 \theta \int{0}^{2\sqrt{3}} r^3\, dr
\]
\[
I3(\theta) = 5 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \int{0}^{2\sqrt{3}} r^2\, dr
\]

Calculating each:


  • \(I_1(\theta)\):


\[
\int{0}^{a} 2r\, dr = r^2 \bigg|{0}^{a} = a^2
\]
with \(a = 2 \sqrt{3}\):

\[
a^2 = (2 \sqrt{3})^2 = 4 \times 3 = 12
\]
So,

\[
I_1(\theta) = 12
\]


  • \(I_2(\theta)\):


\[

  • \sin^2 \theta \times \frac{r^4}{4} \bigg|_{0}^{2 \sqrt{3}} = - \sin^2 \theta \times \frac{(2 \sqrt{3})^4}{4}

\]

Calculate \( (2 \sqrt{3})^4 \):

\[
(2 \sqrt{3})^4 = ( (2)^4 ) \times (\sqrt{3})^4 = 16 \times (3^2) = 16 \times 9 = 144
\]

Thus,

\[
I_2(\theta) = - \sin^2 \theta \times \frac{144}{4} = - \sin^2 \theta \times 36
\]


  • \(I_3(\theta)\):


\[
5 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \times \frac{r^3}{3} \bigg|_{0}^{2 \sqrt{3}} = 5 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \times \frac{(2 \sqrt{3})^3}{3}
\]

Calculate \( (2 \sqrt{3})^3 \):

\[
(2 \sqrt{3})^3 = 2^3 \times (\sqrt{3})^3 = 8 \times 3 \sqrt{3} = 8 \times 3 \sqrt{3} = 24 \sqrt{3}
\]

Therefore:

\[
I_3(\theta) = 5 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \times \frac{24 \sqrt{3}}{3} = 5 (\cos \theta + \sin \theta) \times 8 \sqrt{3}
\]

Simplify:

\[
I_3(\theta) = 40 \sqrt{3} (\cos \theta + \sin \theta)
\]

---

3. Summing the Results

The total integral over \(r\) for a fixed \(\theta\):

\[
J(\

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the first step in converting the given iterated integral to polar coordinates?
The first step is to express the limits and the integrand in terms of polar coordinates, where x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ, and then rewrite the bounds accordingly.
How do you determine the new limits of integration when converting from Cartesian to polar coordinates?
You analyze the original region described by the Cartesian bounds and express those bounds in terms of r and θ, often converting inequalities involving x and y into inequalities involving r and θ.
What is the significance of the Jacobian in converting the integral to polar coordinates?
The Jacobian accounts for the change of variables from (x, y) to (r, θ), and in this case, it is r, which must be multiplied with the integrand when changing variables.
How do you convert the integrand (2 - y^2) in the integral to polar coordinates?
Replace y with r sin θ, so y^2 becomes (r sin θ)^2 = r^2 sin^2 θ, and substitute into the integrand to get 2 - r^2 sin^2 θ.
What are the main challenges in evaluating the given integral after converting to polar coordinates?
The main challenges include accurately determining the bounds in r and θ, simplifying the integrand involving r and θ, and integrating complex expressions like r^3 sin^2 θ.
How can symmetry help in evaluating the integral after converting to polar coordinates?
Symmetry can simplify the integral if the region or the integrand is symmetric, allowing certain parts of the integral to be evaluated as zero or combined to reduce computation.
What is the purpose of converting the integral to polar coordinates in this context?
Converting to polar coordinates simplifies the evaluation of integrals over regions with circular or radial symmetry, making the integrals more manageable.
Can you briefly outline the steps to evaluate the integral after converting to polar coordinates?
Yes, first convert the region to polar bounds, rewrite the integrand in terms of r and θ, include the Jacobian r, set up the new integral with these bounds, and then perform the integration with respect to r and θ.